SolutionsWholesalersInvestors / FlippersAgentsContractors
How It WorksAttractUnderstandOperateConnect
HumphreyMeet HumphreyIAAsk Humphrey
Why ApexWall of ProofComparisonsGreater Than the Sum
LearnFree CourseBlogAbout Apex Vivus
PricingSee pricing
Market Intel · 2026

Why Are Investors Leaving Carrot?

Carrot helped define investor websites and put thousands of investors online. But the number of live Carrot sites has fallen sharply since 2022 — from roughly 15,500 to roughly 6,200. We studied that trajectory, not to pile on, but to understand what changed — and to make sure we don't repeat it.

15.5K → ~6K
Live Carrot sites on the
public web, 2022 → today
~60%
Of its live footprint gone
since the late-2022 peak
~4×
More sites have left Carrot
than still run on it

Before we continue: This isn't a take-down. Carrot helped popularize websites for real estate investors, and plenty of people built real businesses on them — that's worth acknowledging. We wrote this the way any serious operator studies the field: to understand what changed, and to hold Apex to the lessons in it. We're building what comes next, and we'd rather learn from the past than repeat it.

The number of live Carrot sites has fallen by more than half since 2022. We don't say that to dunk on anyone — we say it because the reasons behind it are a roadmap of what every platform should avoid. Including us.

We hear it constantly from investors who came to us frustrated — rankings that used to be rock-solid slipping, traffic flattening, the lead flow that once felt automatic now needing more and more work to hold steady. For a long time the assumption was “it's me — I'm doing something wrong.”

It mostly isn't you. It's structural. And once you see the data, you can't un-see it.

The receipts

What the public data shows

Start with the platform's own footprint. The number of live Carrot sites on the public web has been tracked for years, and the shape of that trend tells the story plainly:

Year Trend Live Carrot sites
2020 Climbing fast ~11,000
2021 Climbing ~13,000–14,000
2022 Peak (late 2022) ~15,500
2023 The cliff — fell to ~8,937 ~8,900
2024 Plateau, then sliding ~8,000–8,800
2025 Sliding to a low ~5,800–6,000

Approximate figures, based on publicly available data on live Carrot sites over time.

The pattern is hard to miss. The platform has shed well over half its live footprint since peaking in late 2022 — by now roughly 24,500 sites have churned off Carrot, against the ~6,000 that remain. Far more have left than stayed.

Carrot's own pages still describe the platform as serving “over 7,000 real estate investors and agents,” a figure echoed across its other member pages. That headcount has held flat in their marketing for years — even as the live-site count above kept sliding. A static customer claim against a shrinking footprint is its own kind of signal.

Carrot helped build this category. Its platform has also been contracting since 2022 — and that's not a gotcha. It's the most useful case study in the business.

Live Carrot websites by yearActive sites on the Carrot platform, 2017–2025
−60% since peak
0 4K 8K 12K 16K ~05005K11K13.3K15.5K8,9378.8K5.8K 201720182019202020212022202320242025 Google Helpful Contentrollout hits
Live Carrot sites on the public web. Approximate figures, based on publicly available data.
What happened in that drop?

We can't see Carrot's books, so we won't pretend to. But the timing is hard to ignore: the cliff lines up with Google's Helpful Content rollout — which targets exactly the kind of templated, near-identical, pre-written content thousands of Carrot sites were built on — and with the 2022–2023 rate shock that pushed a wave of investors out of the market. Two forces, same window. We break down each below.

So the trend is clear. The useful question isn't whether Carrot is good or bad — it's what changed, because the same forces are coming for everyone. Here's what we took from each.

The lessons

Four traps that caught Carrot — and what we took from each

None of these are unique to Carrot. They're traps any website platform can drift into — us included. So for each one, here's the lesson, and how we built Apex to stay out of it.

01

The templated-website trap

Carrot's whole model is scale: thousands of investors running the same templates, the same layouts, much of the same starter content. That was a strength when simply having a real estate site was rare. It became a liability the moment Google decided that templated, near-duplicate content is a problem to be filtered out.

Google's Helpful Content Update — rolled out across 2022 and 2023 and folded into the core algorithm in 2024 — specifically targets exactly this: site-wide patterns of generic, made-for-search content with little to differentiate one site from the next. Thousands of near-identical Carrot sites are a textbook target. Even SEO consultants who specialize in Carrot now say it out loud: most Carrot sites struggle because of duplicate templates and weak, generic content.

That's the engine behind the decline. When the sites stop ranking, the “free leads from Google” promise breaks, and people leave.

The lesson we took: scale can't come at the cost of sameness. Apex sites are niche-built for wholesalers, investors, agents, and contractors, and customizable down to the page — so your site reads like yours, not like the other 500 in your market. Differentiation isn't a nice-to-have anymore; it's the whole game.
02

AI search moved the ground under everyone

Here's the bigger wave. When someone asks ChatGPT or sees a Google AI Overview, there are no ten blue links to rank in — just a synthesized answer citing a few sources. The #1 Google ranking Carrot spent a decade selling can become invisible if the seller gets their answer from the AI and never clicks.

So with members walking and the sites no longer ranking, Carrot needed to give people a reason to stay. Their answer was to sell that same base an “AI SEO Challenge” — training to chase citations inside ChatGPT by seeding Reddit threads and bolting technical files onto your site — wrapped in a “NEW Carrot” relaunch and a wave of content reassuring everyone the leads are still coming. Strip away the packaging and it's retention. The product that built the company stopped working, so instead of fixing it they're keeping the customers they have left busy chasing the next algorithm. First it was Google. Now it's the AI. Either way, you're the one running.

And it's a race almost nobody wins. AI citations go to a tiny handful of big domains, and the same question asked twice barely returns the same brands. A solo investor getting ChatGPT to consistently recommend them in their local market? It rarely happens. Carrot can't fix the thing that's actually breaking — so they're selling the people who stayed a way to feel like they're fighting it. That's not a strategy for where search is going. It's a company working to hold onto its base while the floor drops out beneath it.

And step back from the specific tactic, because this is the part that matters most. Strategies like these — whether it's gaming Google yesterday or gaming ChatGPT today — all run on the same engine: manipulation. They're about tricking the algorithm into believing you deserve to rank, instead of doing the one thing that actually holds up over time — providing real, genuine value that earns the ranking on its own merit. It's the same playbook every here-today, gone-tomorrow marketing agency runs. And it's the exact opposite of what Jerryll, the founder of REILink, has taught investors for over eight years. It's also why his own sites have stayed at the top of Google for nearly a decade — through every major algorithm update that knocked the manipulators down. When you were never gaming the system, there's no update that can take you down.

And that — not bad luck — is exactly how Carrot landed here in the first place. Recycled blog packages everyone was handed. Recycled templates everyone was running. Recycled SEO built to rank instead of to convert — optimized for the algorithm instead of for the actual human who lands on the page. It worked right up until Google decided that kind of mass-produced, sameness content was the exact thing to filter out. The cliff on that chart isn't a mystery. It's what happens when a whole platform is built to please the algorithm instead of the visitor.

The lesson we took: a business shouldn't be one algorithm update from disaster. Apex is built around demand you control — direct-response channels, paid traffic where you set the spend, an active buyer marketplace, and outbound — paired with a system that works every lead no matter where it came from. Be findable in AI, absolutely. But never dependent on being picked by a machine.
03

One channel, no control

Underneath both of those is the real one: the model was built on a single channel its customers don't own. “Rank on Google and the leads come to you” is a beautiful pitch — right up until Google, or AI, changes the rules. Then the whole thing wobbles at once, which is exactly what the curve above shows.

The lesson we took: never let the value live in one channel. Apex is an operating system, not a faucet — website, CRM, pipeline, deal and disposition tools, and EstiMate repair scopes from photos. Leads can come from SEO, ads, mail, referrals, or the marketplace, and the system works them the same either way.
04

When the all-in-one narrows back to a website

The last one is subtle. Carrot now encourages members to pair it with other tools for CRM, follow-up, and deal management. Read one way, that's refreshingly honest. Read another, it's the platform settling back into the one thing it started as — a website — which is also the exact layer that content penalties and AI search are squeezing hardest.

The lesson we took: if you're going to be the system, be the whole system. Apex replaces the six tools you'd otherwise duct-tape together, with the website as one part of it — not the whole bet. The breadth has to be real, or it's better not to claim it.
The verdict

So — Is Carrot Still Worth It in 2026?

Whether Carrot is still worth it for you is your call to make. The more useful question is what its slide teaches — and whether the platform you build your business on learned that lesson or is busy repeating it.

Because Carrot's decline wasn't bad luck, and it wasn't one weak feature. It's what happens when a business is built on ground it doesn't own. Rankings, algorithms, AI engines — borrow your demand from any of them, and you're always one update from the cliff. And when the cliff came, the response was to manage the narrative — a relaunch, a challenge, reassurance content — instead of actually addressing the problem and fixing it. That's the core mistake we built Apex to avoid. Don't spin the problem. Fix what's actually wrong.

So that's what Apex does, point for point. Templated sites that all look alike? Yours is custom and niche-built, not the 500th clone in your market. One borrowed channel? You get an operating system — site, CRM, deal and dispo tools, EstiMate scopes from photos — that works leads from anywhere. At the mercy of whatever Google or ChatGPT decides? You own the medium and the demand: a real buyer network and direct channels that don't disappear in an algorithm update. Carrot's problems aren't mysteries. They're a checklist — and Apex is built to answer every line on it.

The bigger picture

The real problem was never the website

For fifteen years the whole category competed on one layer — the website. That's the layer the decline hit hardest. And it was never the layer that closes deals.

A website can

  • Generate traffic
  • Capture a lead

A website can't

  • Follow up with the lead
  • Price the repairs
  • Build the offer
  • Match it to a buyer
  • Track the revenue
  • Learn from the outcome

The industry spent fifteen years optimizing the website. Apex was built to optimize everything after it.

The platforms that win the next decade won't be the ones chasing the next algorithm. They'll be the ones that made their demand impossible to take away. That's the whole point of Apex.

See it for yourself

See the honest comparison

We'll show you exactly where REILink + Apex fits, what it replaces, and how to keep your current site running while you make the switch — no contract, cancel anytime.

Don't take our word for it

Sources & references

Every claim above traces to a public source. Links open in a new tab.

  1. Carrot: “over 7,000 real estate investors and agents use Carrot.” carrot.com — Carrot vs. other website builders Carrot's own page
  2. Carrot: “we surveyed over 7,000 of our members.” carrot.com — websites for real estate investors Carrot's own page
  3. Carrot homepage — member language, the “NEW Carrot” relaunch, and “don't get trapped in an all-in-one.” carrot.com Carrot's own page
  4. Carrot's “AI Search / AI SEO Challenge.” carrot.com/challenge-2 Carrot's own page
  5. Carrot's AI-SEO blog (the Reddit-citation tactic). carrot.com — AI SEO to get real estate leads Carrot's own page
  6. Carrot's SEO tools — the “AI Search Visibility Challenge” and auto-generated llms.txt. carrot.com/features/seo-tools Carrot's own page
  7. Carrot vs. WordPress — context on “all Carrot sites look alike.” carrot.com/carrot-vs-wordpress Carrot's own page
  8. “Most Carrot sites fail due to duplicate templates.” seoforinvestorcarrot.com Third-party SEO vendor
  9. Google's Helpful Content Update timeline (2022–2024). searchengineland.com — Helpful Content Update Google · Search Engine Land
  10. AI citation is highly concentrated (a few domains capture most citations). marketingforllms.com/ai-seo Third-party